Who Are the NFL Players Suing to Return to College? Full List

The strangest roster battle of the 2026 preseason isn’t for a 53-man spot – it’s the group of players on NFL rosters fighting in court for the right to give those spots back and return to college. A Louisiana judge’s temporary restraining order on Aug. 19 made it real: 33 athletes, 16 of them football players, several of them on NFL rosters at that very moment, were cleared to reclaim a fifth college season.

The names matter, because this story is being litigated one player at a time. Dae’Quan Wright has already run the whole gauntlet – portal, preseason dress list, NFL waivers and a reported LSU deal – in under a week. Others are waiting on this weekend’s roster cuts to learn whether their college option becomes their only option.

Here’s the tracker: every NFL-roster name in the suit, where each stands, and the fast-moving status of the case around them.

NFL-TO-COLLEGE TRACKER
The Players Suing to Return to College
The Louisiana lawsuit’s NFL names, and where each stands
THE SUIT
33 athletes
16 football players, Louisiana court
THE ORDER
TRO granted
Wed, Aug. 19 – injunction hearing next
ON NFL ROSTERS
4 players
When the order came down
LEAGUE-WIDE
~100 athletes
Suing the NCAA over fifth years
The NFL-roster plaintiffs
Where each stood when the order landed – and since
Player Situation
Dae’Quan Wright, TE (Ole Miss) Was on the Browns’ roster; entered the transfer portal Aug. 20, dressed for the Browns’ Aug. 22 preseason game without playing, cleared NFL waivers Tuesday – reported deal in place with LSU
Jack Pyburn, EDGE (LSU) Listed on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers’ roster when the order was granted
Anthony Hankerson, RB (Oregon State) Signed with Miami as an undrafted free agent this spring, later listed on the Seattle Seahawks’ roster
Wydett Williams (Ole Miss) Listed on the Arizona Cardinals’ roster when the order was granted
Zxavian Harris, DT (Ole Miss) Participated in NFL training camps this summer
Status of the case
What the order does – and does not – do
Question Answer
Who does the TRO cover? Only the plaintiffs in the Louisiana lawsuit – it is not a league-wide or class-wide ruling
How long does it last? It’s a temporary measure until the court holds a full injunction hearing
What do the plaintiffs share? All began college in the 2022-23 class, played four seasons, and were excluded when the NCAA’s new five-year rule skipped their class
What’s pushing back? The Big Ten, SEC and (per its commissioner) the ACC have moved to bar players who declared or appeared on a pro roster – setting up a direct conflict
THE BIGGER PICTURE
Not one lawsuit but a wave
ESPN reports roughly 100 athletes across sports are suing the NCAA for a fifth season – state TROs, individual suits and a certified federal class action all running at once.
Why cut weekend matters here
Several plaintiffs’ college plans hinge on being released by their NFL clubs – which makes this weekend’s cutdown to 53 a college football story too.
The NCAA’s position
The NCAA says court-ordered eligibility is having a “destabilizing effect” on college sports and is urging Congress to intervene – while fighting the cases in court.

Why These Players Sued

Every plaintiff shares the same timeline: enrolled in 2022, played four seasons, turned pro believing their eligibility was spent – then watched the NCAA adopt a five-years-in-five rule in June that granted the fifth season to everyone after them. The exclusion of their class is the whole case, and it’s explained in full in the Class of 2022 loophole.

What the Order Actually Grants

A temporary restraining order, not a final ruling: it stops the NCAA from enforcing its eligibility limits against these specific plaintiffs until an injunction hearing. It is narrower than the Wisne federal class action, which certified a nationwide class – but it’s the ruling that first put active NFL-roster players on the college market.

The Wright Test Case

Wright’s week is the template everyone else would follow: transfer portal entry on Aug. 20, waivers cleared Tuesday, and a reported deal with LSU – where coach Lane Kiffin has publicly defended pursuing players in this group. Whether that signing sticks now runs into the Big Ten and SEC bans, approved within hours of Wright clearing waivers. The full saga is in our full Dae’Quan Wright coverage, and the roster mechanics of getting free of an NFL club are in how an NFL release actually works.

What Happens Next

Three clocks are running: the NFL’s cutdown to 53 on Sunday (which may free more plaintiffs), the Louisiana injunction hearing (which decides whether the TRO holds), and the conference bans (which may block even court-cleared players from SEC, Big Ten and ACC rosters). More than a dozen former FBS players have already entered the portal under the various restraining orders, and more are expected if they’re cut this week.

Quick Answers

Are these players still getting paid by NFL teams?

Only while on a roster. Players seeking a return have asked for their releases; a released or waived player stops earning NFL pay and, once clear, is free to pursue the college route.

Does the order apply to any NFL player who wants to return?

No – only the named plaintiffs. Other players in the same class would need to join a suit or file their own, though the legal groundwork is now well-worn.

When will this be settled?

Not soon. Between the injunction hearing, the NCAA’s appeals, the conference bans and a bill in Congress, expect the rules to stay unsettled deep into the season.

The Bottom Line

Sixteen football players – including Dae’Quan Wright, Jack Pyburn, Anthony Hankerson, Wydett Williams and Zxavian Harris – hold a Louisiana court order letting them trade NFL rosters for a fifth college season, with roughly 100 athletes suing league-wide. The order is temporary, the conference bans are new, and this weekend’s NFL cuts will decide who actually makes the jump. This page tracks the names as the story moves.